By Published On: 6 March 20151288 words6.5 min read

By Daria Zeoli, Guest Contributor

Editor’s Note: Since the news broke, there have been several online petitions asking Ringling Bros. to send the elephants to an elephant sanctuary rather than the CEC. I found this one that shows testimony from the general manager of the CEC admitting that elephants are routinely chained up at night and males aren’t permitted to be outside on the grass, among other things. These elephants deserve better. Let’s work together to get them to a proper sanctuary where they can live out their days in peace. Also be sure to check out 7 Ways to Help Elephants Right Now. – KD

The news that Ringling Bros. is retiring elephants from their circus was shocking. It was also very well-received by much of the animal rights community. Is it perfect? No, far from it. But it’s a win for those elephants if it means they aren’t going to be beaten anymore so they’ll perform tricks.

Listen, I know – it’s going to take three years to get the Ringling Bros. elephants off the performing circuit. And Ringling’s parent company, Feld Enterprises Inc., doesn’t have any plans to send them to a sanctuary. And the circus is still going to be a horrible place for all of the other animals that are forced to perform, at Ringling and in other circuses throughout the world.

I get that. And believe me, I understand not cheering for some token “victory” that means nothing – it’s one of the reasons I was so underwhelmed by the “cage free eggs” decision that HSUS and United Egg Producers agreed on a few years ago. “Cage free” doesn’t mean “egg and chicken free.” It doesn’t mean no more chickens, living and dying in horrible conditions.

Here’s why I think an “elephant free” circus is different. Not perfect, but different.

1. One of the reasons behind Ringling’s decision is public perception.

People are aware of the treatment of elephants in the circus, and they don’t like it. Bullhook bans have been sprouting up in cities across the country – the people are out there, and they know what’s going on. Feld Enterprises says it’s not reacting to its critics, but fighting legislation about where they can bring their show is expensive. Well, perhaps they aren’t reacting to the tugged heartstrings, but they are certainly reacting to the tugged pursestrings. Legal aid at the defense of animals matters. Hitting a corporation’s profit margin matters. Are any of us really expecting a corporation that exploits animals for profit to suddenly care about animals? No, that would be naïve. We need to speak to them in the language that matters to them: money. If public perception affects their profitability, you can bet it’s behind their decision.

Keep in mind, ethical vegans: you already speak with your money and vote with your dollar. Every dollar you spend on vegan items is a vote against non-vegan items. And every dollar you don’t spend on products or services you don’t believe in counts, too.

2. This change could mean more is on the way.

Again, Ringling doesn’t seem to have any plans to release its lions and tigers, and it just added a new camel act to its show. We need to change that – through protest and through education. But maybe no longer having elephants perform in the most well-known circus in the country will help elephants in the smaller circuses. And maybe another large mammal who has gained public awareness over the past few years will gain some help from this (looking at you, SeaWorld). In fact, wouldn’t it be logical to assume that Ringling has been watching the post-Blackfish backlash against SeaWorld? Wouldn’t it also be logical to assume that they see retiring the largest mammal in their possession as a direct response to that backlash? It makes them look good to the public at large. So, let’s get to work on making them end animal use all together. Let’s make them stop using smoke and mirrors and really change things!

FURTHER READING: Breaking News: Water is Wet, SeaWorld Sucks

3. There won’t be any new elephants born, bred, or captured… to perform.

This last one comes with a big caveat. The performance piece of the puzzle is ending. But let’s take a closer look.

The 13 performing Ringling Bros. elephants will live with others at the Center for Elephant Conservation in central Florida once they stop performing.

With a total of 43 elephants, Feld owns the largest herd in North America, and spends about $65,000 yearly to care for each one. New structures will be needed to house the retiring elephants at the rural center, which is close enough to Orlando to attract tourists eventually if that’s what Feld decides to offer.

Kenneth Feld said initially the center will be open only to scientists and others studying the Asian elephant, but he “hopes it expands to something the public will be able to see.”

Unfortunately, it sounds like these performing elephants aren’t going to get the peace, quiet, and privacy from human eyes that they deserve. It’s quite obvious that Feld still sees them as an attraction.

Of note: the Center is where Ringling Bros. elephants have been trained re: beaten and bound with ropes to break their spirits. For more about what has been done to elephants at the Center, you can read the very explicit declaration of former handler Samuel Dewitt Haddock Jr. To be clear, the Center for Elephant Conservation is not a nice place. But if you’re asking me if I’m going to celebrate the fact that they won’t be beating the shit out of their elephants, yes, I will be.

The Center also conducts what they call “breeding research,” artificially inseminating captive females to “enhance genetic diversity” and “ensure a healthy Asian elephant population throughout the world.” It’s a breeding farm. Sadly, this isn’t going to stop. Elephants will still be sent to zoos and sold or traded off as property. Again, Ringling, and the Feld Corporation, does not care about its animals.

It’s horrible to have to say this, but the elephants in Ringling’s possession (and I use that word because Ringling very much still sees them as property) were doomed from the start. It’s heart breaking to have to say that they will never have a chance at sanctuary, or at a life they can live on their own terms. But if they aren’t going to be beaten anymore, and paraded around towns to “bring in the circus,” that’s got to be an improvement over what they’re currently living. Not nearly enough, but something.

It’s clear we have a long way to go, and I wish that meant better for the Ringling Bros. elephants. Not getting beaten with a bullhook is a little better. Not breeding more elephants for performance is a lot better. Ending the mindset that animals are attractions would be best.

Ways to Help

The decision to end the use of elephants in Ringling Bros. circus does not mean anyone should rest on their laurels. There is still work to be done and there are still animals that need us.

  • If you protest the circus when it comes to town, don’t stop – your voice is needed now more than ever.
  • Educate those around you. When the news broke, I can’t tell you how many times I saw something like, “Oh no, but the elephants are my favorite part of the circus!” on my various social media feeds. Let people know why animals in entertainment is a bad thing.
  • Help animals wherever you can. The need doesn’t stop at the circus.

We can effect change. We do effect change. The journey continues.

By Published On: 6 March 20151288 words6.5 min read

By Daria Zeoli, Guest Contributor

Editor’s Note: Since the news broke, there have been several online petitions asking Ringling Bros. to send the elephants to an elephant sanctuary rather than the CEC. I found this one that shows testimony from the general manager of the CEC admitting that elephants are routinely chained up at night and males aren’t permitted to be outside on the grass, among other things. These elephants deserve better. Let’s work together to get them to a proper sanctuary where they can live out their days in peace. Also be sure to check out 7 Ways to Help Elephants Right Now. – KD

The news that Ringling Bros. is retiring elephants from their circus was shocking. It was also very well-received by much of the animal rights community. Is it perfect? No, far from it. But it’s a win for those elephants if it means they aren’t going to be beaten anymore so they’ll perform tricks.

Listen, I know – it’s going to take three years to get the Ringling Bros. elephants off the performing circuit. And Ringling’s parent company, Feld Enterprises Inc., doesn’t have any plans to send them to a sanctuary. And the circus is still going to be a horrible place for all of the other animals that are forced to perform, at Ringling and in other circuses throughout the world.

I get that. And believe me, I understand not cheering for some token “victory” that means nothing – it’s one of the reasons I was so underwhelmed by the “cage free eggs” decision that HSUS and United Egg Producers agreed on a few years ago. “Cage free” doesn’t mean “egg and chicken free.” It doesn’t mean no more chickens, living and dying in horrible conditions.

Here’s why I think an “elephant free” circus is different. Not perfect, but different.

1. One of the reasons behind Ringling’s decision is public perception.

People are aware of the treatment of elephants in the circus, and they don’t like it. Bullhook bans have been sprouting up in cities across the country – the people are out there, and they know what’s going on. Feld Enterprises says it’s not reacting to its critics, but fighting legislation about where they can bring their show is expensive. Well, perhaps they aren’t reacting to the tugged heartstrings, but they are certainly reacting to the tugged pursestrings. Legal aid at the defense of animals matters. Hitting a corporation’s profit margin matters. Are any of us really expecting a corporation that exploits animals for profit to suddenly care about animals? No, that would be naïve. We need to speak to them in the language that matters to them: money. If public perception affects their profitability, you can bet it’s behind their decision.

Keep in mind, ethical vegans: you already speak with your money and vote with your dollar. Every dollar you spend on vegan items is a vote against non-vegan items. And every dollar you don’t spend on products or services you don’t believe in counts, too.

2. This change could mean more is on the way.

Again, Ringling doesn’t seem to have any plans to release its lions and tigers, and it just added a new camel act to its show. We need to change that – through protest and through education. But maybe no longer having elephants perform in the most well-known circus in the country will help elephants in the smaller circuses. And maybe another large mammal who has gained public awareness over the past few years will gain some help from this (looking at you, SeaWorld). In fact, wouldn’t it be logical to assume that Ringling has been watching the post-Blackfish backlash against SeaWorld? Wouldn’t it also be logical to assume that they see retiring the largest mammal in their possession as a direct response to that backlash? It makes them look good to the public at large. So, let’s get to work on making them end animal use all together. Let’s make them stop using smoke and mirrors and really change things!

FURTHER READING: Breaking News: Water is Wet, SeaWorld Sucks

3. There won’t be any new elephants born, bred, or captured… to perform.

This last one comes with a big caveat. The performance piece of the puzzle is ending. But let’s take a closer look.

The 13 performing Ringling Bros. elephants will live with others at the Center for Elephant Conservation in central Florida once they stop performing.

With a total of 43 elephants, Feld owns the largest herd in North America, and spends about $65,000 yearly to care for each one. New structures will be needed to house the retiring elephants at the rural center, which is close enough to Orlando to attract tourists eventually if that’s what Feld decides to offer.

Kenneth Feld said initially the center will be open only to scientists and others studying the Asian elephant, but he “hopes it expands to something the public will be able to see.”

Unfortunately, it sounds like these performing elephants aren’t going to get the peace, quiet, and privacy from human eyes that they deserve. It’s quite obvious that Feld still sees them as an attraction.

Of note: the Center is where Ringling Bros. elephants have been trained re: beaten and bound with ropes to break their spirits. For more about what has been done to elephants at the Center, you can read the very explicit declaration of former handler Samuel Dewitt Haddock Jr. To be clear, the Center for Elephant Conservation is not a nice place. But if you’re asking me if I’m going to celebrate the fact that they won’t be beating the shit out of their elephants, yes, I will be.

The Center also conducts what they call “breeding research,” artificially inseminating captive females to “enhance genetic diversity” and “ensure a healthy Asian elephant population throughout the world.” It’s a breeding farm. Sadly, this isn’t going to stop. Elephants will still be sent to zoos and sold or traded off as property. Again, Ringling, and the Feld Corporation, does not care about its animals.

It’s horrible to have to say this, but the elephants in Ringling’s possession (and I use that word because Ringling very much still sees them as property) were doomed from the start. It’s heart breaking to have to say that they will never have a chance at sanctuary, or at a life they can live on their own terms. But if they aren’t going to be beaten anymore, and paraded around towns to “bring in the circus,” that’s got to be an improvement over what they’re currently living. Not nearly enough, but something.

It’s clear we have a long way to go, and I wish that meant better for the Ringling Bros. elephants. Not getting beaten with a bullhook is a little better. Not breeding more elephants for performance is a lot better. Ending the mindset that animals are attractions would be best.

Ways to Help

The decision to end the use of elephants in Ringling Bros. circus does not mean anyone should rest on their laurels. There is still work to be done and there are still animals that need us.

  • If you protest the circus when it comes to town, don’t stop – your voice is needed now more than ever.
  • Educate those around you. When the news broke, I can’t tell you how many times I saw something like, “Oh no, but the elephants are my favorite part of the circus!” on my various social media feeds. Let people know why animals in entertainment is a bad thing.
  • Help animals wherever you can. The need doesn’t stop at the circus.

We can effect change. We do effect change. The journey continues.

Leave a Comment

What do you think? Tell me in the comments.
All comments subject to the terms here.

  1. Joyless_vegan March 24, 2015 at 2:44 pm - Reply

    I’m also curious–are welfarist activists going to now start the process of advocating for the camels who have replaced the elephants in this circus? I’m honestly asking.

  2. Joyless_vegan March 24, 2015 at 2:40 pm - Reply

    I appreciate that you acknowledge that this is not some “victory” and that there’s still a long way to go. But this illustrates exactly how SICs hurt animals: elephants have long been the subject of many SICs and yeah, the public now gets it–or at least, they get it about one single species of animal, which has now been replaced in the circus with camels. This tells the public that while it’s NOT okay to have elephants in the circus, it’s totally fine to have camels (and other animals)! The public will continue going to the circus, because no one in the elephant protests ever told them why they should not exploit animals (ie, promoted veganism). So, yay for elephants in one circus in one country, I guess–but it’s a big NAY for animals, period. Instead of “beating the shit” out of elephants, they’ll be “beating the shit” out of all the animals that activists chose not to advocate for. This is sad.

  3. KD Traegner March 6, 2015 at 6:35 pm - Reply

    I really appreciate the way you laid out the reasons why Ringling Bros. actions are a win and also problematic. It’s obvious that Ringling Bros. doesn’t want a Sea World/Blackfish on their hands- it’s the perfect time to continue raising our voices in protest for and on behalf of all of the other animals they are using. Who knows, maybe they just need to hear advocates tell them that sending these elephants to an animal sanctuary would be more appropriate. Thank you for the great article!