By Published On: 24 June 2010782 words4.1 min read

Came across some bullshit on the internet today.  It’s so full of poop that I don’t even want to post that much about it, but I have to because of twitter.  Oh twitter, I love you so.  I love your constant chatter, your interesting users, your ability to bring people together- I just think you’re rad.  But sometimes twitter, you just annoy me.  Like that time you lost all my followers, that wasn’t fun.  Or the time you wouldn’t let me change my profile picture for months, that was mean too.  But your most annoying habit is actually one of your best traits, the hashtag.  Ah, the hash tag.  For those who don’t know, a hashtag “helps add tweets to a category…(and) have the ‘hash’ or ‘pound’ symbol (#) preceding the tag…”  I love the hashtag, just as much as I love twitter.  This allows me to keep up on all the great vegan tweets out there simply by searching under #vegan.

So what’s the bitch about anyway?  Well today my #vegan twitter feed, which is normally full of great people talking about vegan stuff, was clogged with poop like this:

Consumer Freedom Twitter

Now, I know that Consumer Freedom has chief propagandist, Rick Berman, at it’s helm- and I know that the behind-the-scenes funding comes from, among others, Coca-Cola, Cargill, Tyson Foods, and Monsanto.  So, needless to say, I’m not buying into what they’re peddling if you know what I mean.  But the tweet?  Yeah, that little bad boy was all over my twitter- as if this was a revelation.

Derek Mulhern Twitter

Oh, normally I’d take this with a grain of salt- like I said.  But, since it was there and apparently I had nothing better to do that click on a link that I knew was just going to piss me off, I read the the poop-filled article.  The article is about a vegan, Ryan Andrews, visiting Magnum Feedyard, LLC- a USDA “family farm” and also a CAFO (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation. A CAFO has more than 1,000 animals.) and his experience there.  (Here’s a preview: he compares Magnum to a Holiday Inn for cattle.)

I really don’t want to drag this out, so here’s the best from the article:

When it started in 1993, Magnum had 4,500 cattle. Now they have 22,000. And operations are managed with 8-13 employees (depending on the time of year).

8 – 13 employees care for 22,000 animals. I have 9 companion animals living with me and it can get hairy caring for them on occasions.  Imagine the care that 22,000 animals are receiving.  Oh wait, Andrews addresses that.

Speaking of cleanliness, Magnum wants the cattle to be clean and comfortable.  I know, I know, I can see my animal welfare comrades shaking their heads – but think about it. From a profit standpoint, if animals aren’t comfortable, they aren’t going to eat. If they don’t eat, they don’t grow. If they don’t grow, they won’t be much use to the dude wanting to buy a big steak.

Yes fellow vegans, think about the lives of those animals from a profit standpoint- insert ironic statement about being antithetical to the core vegan belief that humans have no right to use animals in any way here.

And this gem,

Magnum recently started composting manure and moralities (i.e. cattle that don’t make it). It’s gotten more expensive to send deceased cattle to processing plants that manufacture pet foods, so this was the next best option.

None of the cows make it.  None of them do- all 22,000 will be slaughtered at some point.

Confusingly, Andrews goes on to say…

Now, to be clear, we don’t require meat in our diet.  And I don’t think we should be using cows for food, doesn’t matter if the cattle are kept on a feedlot or chilling in a waterbed listening to John Tesh. But that’s my own value system and I’m well aware that 97% of people in the U.S. eat meat on a regular basis.

What the hell is he trying to say?  If you can’t beat them, join them?  I don’t understand not living to one’s values and going so far as to promote the very thing you stand against, I just don’t.

Then the whole article closes with this…

People want meat.  And Magnum’s feedlot system is dialed in.  They’re producing safe and cost-effective meat in, arguably, the most cattle-conscious way (short of opening up those pens and letting them run free).  Rock on Magnum.

Andrews is apparently a vegan who is okay with the loss of 22,000 sentient beings.  I’m not.

If you’d like to read the poop-filled article for yourself, you can by clicking here.

By Published On: 24 June 2010782 words4.1 min read

Came across some bullshit on the internet today.  It’s so full of poop that I don’t even want to post that much about it, but I have to because of twitter.  Oh twitter, I love you so.  I love your constant chatter, your interesting users, your ability to bring people together- I just think you’re rad.  But sometimes twitter, you just annoy me.  Like that time you lost all my followers, that wasn’t fun.  Or the time you wouldn’t let me change my profile picture for months, that was mean too.  But your most annoying habit is actually one of your best traits, the hashtag.  Ah, the hash tag.  For those who don’t know, a hashtag “helps add tweets to a category…(and) have the ‘hash’ or ‘pound’ symbol (#) preceding the tag…”  I love the hashtag, just as much as I love twitter.  This allows me to keep up on all the great vegan tweets out there simply by searching under #vegan.

So what’s the bitch about anyway?  Well today my #vegan twitter feed, which is normally full of great people talking about vegan stuff, was clogged with poop like this:

Consumer Freedom Twitter

Now, I know that Consumer Freedom has chief propagandist, Rick Berman, at it’s helm- and I know that the behind-the-scenes funding comes from, among others, Coca-Cola, Cargill, Tyson Foods, and Monsanto.  So, needless to say, I’m not buying into what they’re peddling if you know what I mean.  But the tweet?  Yeah, that little bad boy was all over my twitter- as if this was a revelation.

Derek Mulhern Twitter

Oh, normally I’d take this with a grain of salt- like I said.  But, since it was there and apparently I had nothing better to do that click on a link that I knew was just going to piss me off, I read the the poop-filled article.  The article is about a vegan, Ryan Andrews, visiting Magnum Feedyard, LLC- a USDA “family farm” and also a CAFO (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation. A CAFO has more than 1,000 animals.) and his experience there.  (Here’s a preview: he compares Magnum to a Holiday Inn for cattle.)

I really don’t want to drag this out, so here’s the best from the article:

When it started in 1993, Magnum had 4,500 cattle. Now they have 22,000. And operations are managed with 8-13 employees (depending on the time of year).

8 – 13 employees care for 22,000 animals. I have 9 companion animals living with me and it can get hairy caring for them on occasions.  Imagine the care that 22,000 animals are receiving.  Oh wait, Andrews addresses that.

Speaking of cleanliness, Magnum wants the cattle to be clean and comfortable.  I know, I know, I can see my animal welfare comrades shaking their heads – but think about it. From a profit standpoint, if animals aren’t comfortable, they aren’t going to eat. If they don’t eat, they don’t grow. If they don’t grow, they won’t be much use to the dude wanting to buy a big steak.

Yes fellow vegans, think about the lives of those animals from a profit standpoint- insert ironic statement about being antithetical to the core vegan belief that humans have no right to use animals in any way here.

And this gem,

Magnum recently started composting manure and moralities (i.e. cattle that don’t make it). It’s gotten more expensive to send deceased cattle to processing plants that manufacture pet foods, so this was the next best option.

None of the cows make it.  None of them do- all 22,000 will be slaughtered at some point.

Confusingly, Andrews goes on to say…

Now, to be clear, we don’t require meat in our diet.  And I don’t think we should be using cows for food, doesn’t matter if the cattle are kept on a feedlot or chilling in a waterbed listening to John Tesh. But that’s my own value system and I’m well aware that 97% of people in the U.S. eat meat on a regular basis.

What the hell is he trying to say?  If you can’t beat them, join them?  I don’t understand not living to one’s values and going so far as to promote the very thing you stand against, I just don’t.

Then the whole article closes with this…

People want meat.  And Magnum’s feedlot system is dialed in.  They’re producing safe and cost-effective meat in, arguably, the most cattle-conscious way (short of opening up those pens and letting them run free).  Rock on Magnum.

Andrews is apparently a vegan who is okay with the loss of 22,000 sentient beings.  I’m not.

If you’d like to read the poop-filled article for yourself, you can by clicking here.

Leave a Comment

What do you think? Tell me in the comments.
All comments subject to the terms here.

  1. Shay July 15, 2013 at 12:22 am - Reply

    So I’m confused.

    You, as a self proclaimed vegan, are berating this vegan nutritionist about his apparent “ironic statement about being antithetical to the core vegan belief that humans have no right to use animals in any way” and yet you state in the section directly above that “I have 9 companion animals living with me”

    Wouldn’t that mean that you, as a vegan yourself, having these nine companion animals living with you, are too being antithetical to the core vegan belief that humans have no right to use animals in ANY WAY?

    • KD Traegner July 15, 2013 at 7:03 am - Reply

      @Shay – Actually, no. We’ve domesticated dogs and cats to the point of overpopulation. As a result, it’s our responsibility to care for them. If there were a time when this wasn’t the case, I’d be fine not sharing my home with any animals. I’m not using them as “pets,” I’m caring for them as individuals. Thanks for the comment and thought.

  2. jeff December 2, 2011 at 3:36 pm - Reply

    I have read that article, and what i came away from it with, was no, he does not condone, what is done there, be he was trying to be objective, and be open minded towards other people… You seem to think that us non vegans should be 100% understanding of you and your ways yet we dont deserve any understanding or patience because we dont share your views… that is more poop-filled than anything he said in his article. You may want to try and give a little understanding if you want to receive some… have you ever thought the reason people have such a bad taste in their mouth about vegans, is because they are so prejudiced against those of us who they deem unenlightened?

    • KD December 2, 2011 at 4:54 pm - Reply

      Jeff- I hope I don’t sound rude when I tell you that you have no idea what I think, so claiming that I expect 100% understanding from anyone is a far reach. If you knew anything about me, who I am, or why I write for this site (hell, if you read more of what I write even) you would know that I preach respect every day. That said, I’m entitled to my own opinion and I stand by every word I wrote. I don’t wonder (like you mentioned I might) why vegans have negative stereotypes against them- I’m vegan so I’m well aware of them and the reasons. None of which, by the way, have anything to do with my article or what I wrote. I wrote an opinion on an article about a situation- I didn’t judge the vegan- I made comment about the situation. There is a difference, and even if there weren’t- everyone judges everyone and anyone who says different lies.

  3. […] Disillusioned vegan visits cattle feedlot, leaves impressed … […]

  4. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Your Daily Vegan, Karen Shepard. Karen Shepard said: RT @YourDailyVegan: A disillusioned vegan visits cattle feedlot and comes away impressed http://ht.ly/22NbP #vegan […]